![[identity profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/openid.png)
![[community profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/community.png)
DISCLAIMER: I haven't seen the movie.
A friend sent me this, and said it explained to her that she would find Wilson more interesting as the one with the scar. I think it's a similar but different dynamic. If I've posted this in the wrong community, please let me know.
http://recessional.dreamwidth.org/64119.html
no subject
Date: 2010-03-17 07:53 pm (UTC)I like the differences between the two dynamics.
And i think House is a wonderfully done modern take of the Holmesian mythos. It captures the classic elements of Doyle's famous sleuth with much more modern connotations.
Wilson's weaknesses is more subtle than Watson's and vice versa, Holmes' damage is more subtle than House's.
no subject
Date: 2010-03-17 09:56 pm (UTC)In the latest chapter of my fiction, "The Princess And The Peeved," I tried to write about what would happen if House's leg were a central part of the sexual experience, not the way you think. It's a crack AU fic.
no subject
Date: 2010-03-17 10:10 pm (UTC)The issue with the injury is that in "A Study In Scarlet" Watson mentions how he was shot in the shoulder; there's no mention of a leg wound. Then, in various following stories, he'll either mention favoring his leg or his shoulder.
A lot of fans have simply taken it to mean he has an injury in BOTH places to refrain from further confusion. I think the leg injury was also preferential in the movie because Watson could then have a cane, which he used both for walking and as a weapon.
I hope that helps! I don't comment here often but I was intrigued by your Holmes/Watson post. :)
no subject
Date: 2010-03-18 02:13 am (UTC)